Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Brady's avatar

I always enjoy reading write-ups like this, since I often wonder how much sense the peculiarities of wrestling make to the casual observer. Some comments either in response to your thoughts or just reacting to the events of WrestleMania:

-Your description of Gunther is pretty hilarious, because he does seem like a "default" wrestler. Hopefully you got a better idea of what he's all about when watching him, but I would say that his primary appeal is that he's a total workhorse who appears physically dominant while bringing the best out of most everyone he fights.

-Charlotte Flair vs. Tiffany Stratton: As you noticed, it definitely seemed like WWE was going to give Charlotte the championship because they want/expect her to be popular. She has been a very good wrestler in the past, but her character and skills have remained stagnant for the past several years, and the crowds have definitely not been happy about her sense of entitlement. Fortunately, WWE has gotten better in recent years at reading the reactions of fans and making adjustments to avoid completely pissing everybody off. I'm glad they figured out that having Charlotte win wasn't the right choice. That said, the match ended up being very good, providing a glimpse of why Charlotte is so well regarded and also why Tiffany is her heir apparent.

-While people were sick of Roman Reigns around 10 years ago, he made some improvements that got fans on board with him. This happened around the time he made a heel turn and became the "Tribal Chief," after which he had a championship reign that lasted for several years and dominated pretty much everybody. It's one of the examples of WWE figuring out how to make people care about characters through organic storytelling rather than making us feel like certain wrestlers are being shoved down our throats.

-The night 1 triple threat match is one of those cases where the conflicts probably make little sense to outsiders. They weren't fighting for a championship, so it does seem a bit silly to make it seem like such a huge deal that one of these guys prevailed over the others. The characters have been talking about this match deciding who will lead the future of WWE, but that's just standard rhetoric for this sort of thing. However, it was a fairly notable event in that it marked a heel turn for Seth Rollins, as well as a potential face turn for Roman Reigns (that's known as a double turn, which is pretty rare).

-Logan Paul is someone WWE fans have had to make peace with, although lord knows that I do hate it whenever he wins. He's managed to become a pretty good wrestler, and he has leaned in to the hate, playing up his role as a heel. I suppose that means he's doing his job, since heels are meant to be hated and booed, and we're supposed to be unhappy when they win. I would definitely prefer if he disappeared forever, but if he has to be here, I'm glad he can at least provide some entertainment.

-The final match would have been perfectly fine if it weren't for the inclusion of Travis Scott, which was incredibly stupid and irritating. It would have made much more sense for The Rock to play the same role, and forcing an untalented musician (and I say that as somebody who listens primarily to hip hop) into the mix for no reason almost ruined the entire thing.

-Regardless of the occasional dumb stuff, it sounds like you enjoyed it! I don't know if this will make you a full-time wrestling fan, but you at least got some idea of the exhilaration that good matches, interesting characters, and over-the-top plot twists can provide.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts